1. To see if
adolescents who live in poverty or low-income families develop more mental
illnesses or problems with their brain.
2. 804 adolescents
between the ages of 12 and 18.
3. There was no
control group spoken about.
4. They were chosen
from different income families, but this was found out through the Canadian
census.
5. The experimenters
are just going to be observing the subjects and will check up in 10 years to
see their mental health.
6. It is unknown how
the subjects are reacting at this time.
7. This study is not
completely finished, so it is unknown. But the experimenters do expect the
low-income adolescents to develop mental illnesses.
1. This research
shows that a new eye scanner can detect the signs of Alzheimer’s disease many
years before a person shows visual symptoms of the disease.
2. 16 Alzheimer’s
disease patients were used.
3. The patients were
compared to an unnumbered group of healthy adults.
4. The subjects were
chosen because they had Alzheimer’s disease.
5. The subjects drank
a solution with a supplement in it that causes a certain plaque in the retina
of the eye, and can be scanned.
6. It was able to be
seen that this plaque shows Alzheimer’s.
7. They did react the
way the experimenter’s hoped, plaque was seen that means Alzheimer’s.
1. The research was
to see the link between lack of sleep and making riskier decisions in humans.
2. 14 males, 18-28 years
old.
3. There was no
control group stated.
4. They must have
volunteered and been within the age range.
5. The subjects were
made to sleep only 5 hours per night for a week and then had to take money,
either lower guaranteed amounts or higher not guaranteed amounts.
6. The subjects chose
the riskier option more often with less sleep.
7. Yes, the
experimenters expected this result.
1. The research was
to search for an existence of a link between kids being excluded from school
and having mental disorders.
2. Over 5000 children
plus over 200 who had been excluded for sure.
3. No control group
was mentioned.
4. The subjects were
picked from two surveys to see how they were excluded and such.
5. They just had the
subjects fill out surveys and compared the results of how they were excluded
and for how long.
6. There was no
visual reacting from the subjects other than checking on them in later years
and observing their mental health.
7. Yes, I believe
they did act the way that was expected of them.
No comments:
Post a Comment